Archive

Author Archive

Creepy Facebook

July 15th, 2010

I just got this email from Facebook (revealing personal details redacted):

From: Facebook <upda...@facebookmail.com>
Reply-to: Facebook <upda...@facebookmail.com>
To: XXXXXXXXXXXX Park <xxxx...@berkeley.edu>
Subject: YYYYYYYYYY Park is waiting to share with you on Facebook
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 20:32:53 -0700

=======================================
To see what YYYYYYYYYY is up to and start sharing, go to Facebook:
<link deleted>
=======================================

Hi XXXXXXXXXXXX,

Just a reminder that YYYYYYYYYY Park has confirmed your friend
request and you're now friends on Facebook.

YYYYYYYYYY Park:
<link deleted>

Thanks,
The Facebook Team

To see what YYYYYYYYYY is up to and start sharing, go to Facebook:
<link deleted>

=======================================
This message was intended for xxxx...@berkeley.edu. If you do not wish
to receive this type of email from Facebook in the future, please
click on the link below to unsubscribe.
<link deleted>
Facebook, Inc. P.O. Box 10005, Palo Alto, CA 94303

Well. If I didn’t happen to own both accounts, I might have thought “YYYYYYYYYY Park” was actually doing something to attract my attention. Then the scary (and creepy) thought is, how many emails has Facebook sent “on my behalf”?

I hated this when third party apps were doing this (oh, was that 3 years or 4 years now), and I can’t say I love it now.

Author: bkpark Categories: tech Tags: , ,

Article dump, late March through April

June 1st, 2010

I am finally back from my trip, and as things got really busy towards the end of my stay at RRI, I haven’t been able to talk more about articles I’ve read that made an impression on me. Some of them are really outdated by now (about a month old) so I can’t really talk about them individually, but I guess if you combine enough of them together, it could make for a blog post. So, here’s the dump of all the articles (all from WSJ, as that’s the newspaper I get on my Kindle) I wanted to comment on in the last month:

  • The More, The Better: this is why I feel optimistic about America in the long run. This is a mighty country, based on a mighty continent. And we are still growing, unlike the old countries in Europe or some in Asia.
  • “They recommend that doctors ask themselves honestly about their intent in conducting the search and whether the outcome might compromise the trust and relationship between the doctor and patient. Doctors, they say, should consider asking the patient for consent.”: I don’t know. If they have to ask, they probably shouldn’t. Or, at least on an individual basis, it would be a creepy question to ask: “May I google you from time to time?” Such question is better placed on a form with all those waivers, like one of those privacy opt-out things. On another note, doctors googling their patients is especially creepy—while the information they find is supposedly public, because doctors have privileged information about their patients, they may be able to piece together the whole, probably private, picture better than random strangers could.
  • Basically an Optimist—Still: “Today nobody believes that, except maybe in North Korea. You go to China, India, Brazil, Argentina, Mexico, even Western Europe. Most of the economists under 50 have a free-market orientation. Now, there are differences of emphasis and opinion among them. But they’re oriented toward the markets.” A new hope? Liberal-socialism is becoming, year by year and decade by decade more intellectually bankrupt. While the tide is still against us, we may be able to reverse it—in our lifetime.
  • Vallejo’s Painful Lessons in Municipal Bankruptcy: Well. Here’s a city I should remember never to move into, regardless of how attractive some rentals seem.
  • Harvesting Lunar Soil For Energy Bonanza: “What’s so special about lunar soil? It contains helium-3, a non radioactive isotope that fuels clean nuclear fusion.” Sounds like science fiction. In particular, this science fiction.
  • Business Bids to Shape Health Changes: “The U.S. Chamber of Commerce is planning a broad effort to blunt the health overhaul by trying to shape its regulatory language and spending heavily to unseat vulnerable Democrats who voted for it.” ‘Wish they started the fight earlier. Instead, Obamacare is marked with special deals for big businesses, such as Big Pharma, at the cost of everyone else.
  • Militia Chief’s Mistrust Festered, Friends Say: “While he rarely attended church, he studied the Bible nightly, memorizing long passages, said Ms. Harsh, his ex-fiance.” A slight problem: For Christians, belonging in a community of believers is not merely recommended; it’s required. So by any measurable standard, this militia leader was not a Christian.
  • The ObamaCare Writedowns—II: “In other words, CEOs who must abide by U.S. accounting laws under pain of SEC sanction, and who warned about such writedowns for months, are merely trying to ruin President Obama’s moment of glory. Sure.” Aye. On the other hand, investors would be wise to discount these writedowns as they do with most one-time charges in trying to predict future earnings.
  • The Superstar Effect: Interesting. Would the same effect exist in a cooperative situation as well? i.e. Mr. Best will be carrying most of the load; why should we work hard?
  • Corruption You Can Count On: (I also can’t find it online) “But to the discomfort of development economists and anti-corruption crusaders, some of the great economic success stories of the past half-century have taken place in the most corrupt economies on earth. In Transparency’s first corruption ranking in 1995, the two countries that ranked as the most corrupt were Indonesia and China. Yet these ratings came amid decades-long economic booms.” Not too surprising. As long as bribes are consistent, are they really different from rush processing fees you pay at various places in U.S.?
  • Fire and Fumes Can’t Drive Indians From Hellish Village: “But many of the government’s more ambitious plans to help its most vulnerable citizens are failing because they are poorly conceived and executed. Even as the government has poured billions of dollars into an initiative to employ unskilled rural workers, the program has been plagued with charges of corruption and mismanagement.” Well. There’s always the saying; rising tides raise all boats. Perhaps those billions would be better spent cutting taxes and encouraging growth (and in some aspects, Bangalore seemed to have more vibrant free market than the Bay Area).
  • More Americans Sever U.S. Ties as IRS Gets Tougher: “According to public records, just over 500 people world-wide renounced U.S. citizenship or permanent residency in the fourth quarter of 2009, the most recent period for which data are available. That is more people than have cut ties with the U.S. during all of 2007, and more than double the total expatriations in 2008.” Appalling but I guess encouraging: even if 2,000 people did give up U.S. citizenship annually, that’s much fewer than the number of people getting naturalized annually (although it must hurt that most people giving up U.S. citizenship must be far richer than average immigrants).
  • Mr. Dimon Goes to Washington: ‘The incessant broad-based vilification of the banking industry isn’t fair and it is damaging,” Mr. Dimon said. “Punishing whole industries, whether you were reckless or not, just isn’t the way to do things.”‘ ‘Would’ve been more convincing for him to say that it wasn’t government’s business to mess with the market, either in bailing out or punishing. Instead, Mr. Dimon comes off as if he’s saying government help is welcome but its welcome has worn out when it wants to exact payments.
  • In the Search for a Hot Job Title, Enter the Ninja: “In finance, ninja has a more dubious meaning—it’s an acronym for a kind of loan in which a bank hasn’t verified an applicant’s income, job, or assets. After the housing bubble, many of these sorts of loans ended up in default, with their borrowers disappearing like ninjas.” Oh, interesting. Perhaps CS ninjas will end up the same way.
  • Not All Differences in Earnings Are Created Equal: “But do women really earn that much less than men? It depends on how you interpret the numbers.” Numbers always lie. When you work with statistics, you can always massage the numbers to make them give you the result you want.
  • Taliban Capitalize on Afghan Logging Ban: “Deforestation, in turn, leads to soil erosion, flooding, and air pollution—which is why the Afghan government, with the support of international environmental groups, imposed the 2006 prohibition.” Yet another misguided leftist project—imposing our standards on another nation.

Well. This covers the articles I had clipped up ’til April 15th, when I got stuck at Frankfurt. I’ll look over what I missed and post another article dump, if necessary.

Author: bkpark Categories: politics, travel Tags: ,

More Orwellian word choices from my beloved union

May 25th, 2010

Recent email from my beloved UAW 2865:

From: UAW 2865 Berkeley <berk...@uaw2865.org>
To: xxxx...@xxxxx.com
Subject: Healthcare Bargaining Update; Straw Poll on Demands
Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 16:23:22 +0000 (UTC)

Dear UAW Local 2865 member,

We are writing to update you on the current state of bargaining with the UC over
our healthcare benefits. On May 17, the University abruptly broke off
negotiations over implementation of a systemwide GSHIP that is to take effect
before the end of our current contract. The systemwide GSHIP contains many
positive features and we are pleased that the UC has accepted many of our
recommendations.  However, we feel strongly that further improvements can and
must be made, especially with regards to dependent healthcare benefits. To this
end, we will continue to bargain with the University for dependent-care-coverage
remissions in our full contract negotiations.  In continuing negotiations, we will
continue to demand a systemwide GSHIP that includes (1) the participation of all
ten campuses, (2) a benefits package that is strong enough that all campuses
feel it is in their best interest to participate in the plan, and (3) a consistently
high quality of healthcare across all campuses.
   Moreover, we continue to maintain that the university must bargain any
changes that would occur after September 30, 2010 (the expiration of our
current contract).

In order to achieve these goals as we transition into bargaining over the full
contract, we are taking a straw poll to reaffirm our members’ commitment to our
position regarding GSHIP. Polling began Monday, May 24, and will end on
Thursday, May 27. Furthermore, as we move into the full contract negotiations,
we will have a bargaining kickoff event to demonstrate the importance of our
working conditions on the learning conditions of UC students. This event will
take place on Wednesday, June 2, 2010 from noon to 1pm across all UC
campuses. We will continue to bargain over GSHIP in the successor contract
negotiations based on your reaffirmed commitment.

Polling is happening through member-to-member organizing (on campus, on the
phone, etc.). If you want to weigh in via email, please reply no later than
midnight on Thursday. Please include your full name with your response.

Poll language:
We support UAW 2865’s position that (1) a systemwide GSHIP must have a
benefits package that is strong enough that all campuses feel it is in their best
interest to participate in the plan, and that (2) the quality of healthcare should
be consistent at all campuses. We also support UAW 2865’s position that the
University shall not make any changes to GSHIP after September 30, 2010
without agreement from UAW 2865.

Stay tuned for more detailed information on our planned actions. To find out
how you can be involved, please contact your campus office.

In solidarity,

UAW Local 2865 Bargaining Committee

Molly Ball, Davis Recording Secretary
Kelly Burns, Santa Barbara Recording Secretary
Jorge Cabrera, Santa Barbara Chair
Josh Cho, Irvine Chair
Evelyn Fidler, San Diego Chair
John Gust, Riverside Recording Secretary
Des Harmon, Los Angeles Recording Secretary
Nick Kardahji, Berkeley Recording Secretary
Jessy Lancaster, Santa Cruz Recording Secretary
Juliette Lunger, Los Angeles Chair
Brian Malone, Santa Cruz Chair
David Selby, San Diego Recording Secretary
Jessica Taal, Berkeley Chair

Bron Tamulis, Irvine Recording Secretary
David Willhoite, Riverside Chair
Jesse Woo, Davis Chair

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
UAW 2865 Berkeley
2070 Allston Way, Suite 205
Berkeley, CA 94704
phone: (510) 849-1628  /  fax: (510) 549-2514
berk...@uaw2865.org  /  www.uaw2865.org

mail-list.com    1302 Waugh Dr. #438    Houston, Texas    77019    USA

This message was launched into cyberspace to xxxx...@xxxxx.com

Uh, really? When you call something “straw poll”, don’t you usually have more than one choice? I understand that this “straw poll” would be nonbinding (as all straw polls are), but what they are trying to do here is not get a genuine level of support from UAW 2865 members. What they are trying to do here is goose up fake support (esp. goosed up by union mobs carrying clipboards on campus throughout this week) and call it a “poll”. This sounds more like the poll they conduct in North Korea. You know, vote for Secretary Kim as the new secretary, or don’t vote at all.

Well. I remember what happened last time I signed something than looked innocuous from my beloved UAW 2865. They turned the statement into vicious bullying demands while retaining my name among the signatories. And this statement doesn’t even look innocuous right from the start, so it’s clear what I should do—rip up the paper if anyone hands me one to sign.

P.S. There’s only one thing I want out of GSHIP: I want to be able to opt out of it (and keep the benefits as actual dollars, reduced for tax if necessary). Frankly, I don’t like the pool I am in as a participant in GSHIP, and I can do far better on my own (even after the tax penalty) outside the system.

Author: bkpark Categories: ucb Tags: , ,

Typical: my union assumes I am a Democrat

May 17th, 2010

Here’s yet another email from my beloved union (private email addresses redacted):

From: UAW 2865 Berkeley <berk...@uaw2865.org>
To: xxxx...@xxxxx.com
Subject: June 8th Primary Election Recommendations
Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 16:58:20 +0000 (UTC)

Dear UAW 2865 members,

The June 8th Primary election is just around the corner, and many of you are
already receiving your absentee ballots.

As public employees, it is crucial that we stay engaged in the electoral
process, as the decisions that are made by our public officials impact our lives
as workers, students as well as residents. We work to elect, and hold
accountable, pro-labor, pro-higher-education candidates.

Below you will find recommendations from UAW and the California State
Federation of Labor on statewide and local races and ballot measures.

Governor
Jerry Brown

United States Senator
Barbara Boxer

Lieutenant Governor
Janice Hahn

Attorney General
No Recommendation

Secretary of State
Debra Bowen

Treasurer
Bill Lockyer

Controller
John Chiang

Superintendent of Public Instruction
Tom Torlakson

Insurance Commissioner
DUAL: Hector De La Torre and Dave Jones

Board of Equalization
District 1 - Betty Yee
District 2 - Chris Parker
District 3 - No Endorsement
District 4 - Jerome Horton

Proposition 13 - Tax Assessment for Seismic Retrofit
Recommendation: Vote YES
This proposition is an important tax reform that, if passed, will create jobs
and make our buildings safer.

Proposition 14 - Top Two Primary
Recommendation: Vote NO
This proposition, if passed, will eliminate partisan primaries, limit voter
choice, bar small parties and independents from competing in the general
election, and lead to more personality-driven, less issue-driven politics.

Proposition 15 - California Fair Elections Act
Recommendation: Vote YES
This proposition, if passed, will create a pilot program to publicly finance
elections for Secretary of State.

Proposition 16 - Two-Thirds Approval for Local Public Power
Recommendation: Vote NO
This proposition is a blatant power grab by PG&E to maintain their monopoly and
if passed, will make it harder for local communities to take control of their
energy production.

Proposition 17 - Alter Auto Insurance Company Regulations
Recommend: Vote NO
This proposition is an initiative backed by a single major insurance company that,
if passed, will lead to higher insurance rates for many drivers.

US Congressional Representatives
9th District Barbara Lee

13th District Fortney “Pete” Stark

CA State Assembly
14th District Nancy Skinner
16th District Sandre Swanson

Alameda County Supervisor
District 2 - Nadia Lockyer
District 3 - Wilma Chan

Alameda County Sheriff
N/A

Alameda County District Attorney
N/A

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
UAW 2865 Berkeley
2070 Allston Way, Suite 205
Berkeley, CA 94704
phone: (510) 849-1628  /  fax: (510) 549-2514
berk...@uaw2865.org  /  www.uaw2865.org

mail-list.com    1302 Waugh Dr. #438    Houston, Texas    77019    USA

This message was launched into cyberspace to xxxx...@xxxxx.com

Maybe it’s just me, but I think it’s … revealing how my beloved UAW 2865 is recommending me to vote in Democratic primary. In other words, unions are just nothing but partisan organizations working on behalf of Democrats (for the record, I am a registered Libertarian, and I am regretting that choice this particular election season, as I cannot vote in the Republican primary for my favored candidates (e.g. Mr. DeVore)).

On the non-partisan matters (i.e. propositions; although I am not entirely sure what the point of primary voting for propositions is; do the defeated propositions not appear in the general ballot, or do the propositions simply lose the support of the party?), I am distressed that I agreed with UAW 2865′s positions on Props. 13 and 14, but I am glad that I voted the right way for the remaining propositions. Three out of five ain’t so bad.

Author: bkpark Categories: politics Tags: , ,

One day too late

April 17th, 2010

Here’s one depressing email from United Airlines (private email address redacted):

From: United <ema...@info.united.com>
Reply-To: United Replies <rep...@info.united.com>
To: xxx...@BKPARK.COM
Subject: European travel notification
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 19:23:03 0600

To ensure receipt of our emails, please add
ema...@info.united.com to your Address Book.
============================================================
United(R)
============================================================

Dear Mr. Byung Kyu Park,

Several European countries have closed their airspace due to
unsafe flying conditions resulting from a volcanic ash plume
that is covering significant portions of northern Europe.

Thousands of flights to and from major European airports
have been canceled, and Eurocontrol, the European air
traffic agency, has said that travel disruptions and delays
will continue well into Saturday as the massive ash cloud
moves slowly south and east. We know that unexpected flight
cancellations are difficult. However, our highest priority
is your safety and that of our crews.

 . If your flight has been canceled, we will rebook you on
   the next United flight with available seats. Check your
   flight status.

http://www.ua2go.com/flifo/FlightInput.do

 . Even if your flight has not yet been canceled, your
   travel may be covered by a travel waiver, and you may be
   able to change your plans without incurring a service
   charge.

http://www.united.com/page/article/0,6867,53414,00.html

 . If your travel plans are impacted by this situation and
   you decide to cancel your trip, you may be eligible for
   a refund of any unused portion of your ticket.

http://www.united.com/page/article/0,6722,52940,00.html

In order to provide additional assistance to our customers
who are currently in Europe, we have extended the hours of
our European reservations centers.

http://www.united.com/page/article/0,1360,50394,00.html

Please know that we are working hard to reaccommodate all of
our customers whose travel has been impacted and to resume
flying our full schedule as soon as possible.

Sincerely,

United Airlines

============================================================

My mileage summary

http://www.mymileageplus.com

united.com

http://www.united.com

Partner offers

http://www.united.com/page/article/0,8566,1249,00.html

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Change your email address

http://www.ua2go.com/ci/Login.jsp?return_to=emailsubscriptions&country=us

Update your email preferences

http://www.ua2go.com/ci/Login.jsp?return_to=emailsubscriptions&country=us

Privacy policy

http://www.united.com/page/article/0,6722,1002,00.html

You are subscribed to receive information and updates from
United at xxx...@BKPARK.COM.

Please do not reply to this email. We cannot accept
electronic replies to this email address.

To contact the sender, write to:
United Airlines Operations Center - WHQPW,
1200 E. Algonquin Rd.,
Elk Grove Township,
Illinois 60007 USA

Copyright 2010 United Air Lines, Inc. All rights reserved.

What’s depressing about it? The date: it’s dated April 16th, but the volcano erupted on the 14th and the problem with air travel started early 15th. I only wish United had this attitude on the 15th—that may have lead the CS rep to agree to modify my ticket like I wanted to initially and let me travel to London by train (when the bulk of the air traffic had not yet been diverted to train).

Things still would be rough, since my main luggage would not be with me, but I wouldn’t be as depressed as I am now, stuck in the least favorite continent (Europe), in the least favorite country (Germany), in the least favorite city (Frankfurt), and in the least favorite airport (FRA) in the whole universe (I reserve judgment on Martians).

Given that this is presumably a once-in-a-lifetime incident I am not sure how well the lesson would apply, the lesson is learned: in the event of natural disaster, don’t assume things will get better, and let the customer service reps know I will hold them personally responsible for not obeying my wishes (or at least not escalating it to higher level where they know their proper place)—which, in most cases, prove prudent and correct in the long run—in the event things do get worse.

A post-mortem of the London trip, 2010

April 16th, 2010

So, thanks to an act of God, my London trip this year is cancelled. This is very disappointing to me, as this would have been my first trip to England with a high chance of adding a second European country to my “good countries” list (Germany, by the way, will never make that list; at least until there is a world war in which Germany fights on our side. Actually, make that 3, first 2 necessary just to cancel out the WWI and WWII). Anyways. Here is the record of all the things that have gone wrong, and a couple things that, if I had done differently, might have changed things for the better.

So the very first thing I did wrong was being slow in reacting to the news. I was lucky enough to be one of the first to hear that our flight got cancelled (and since the flight was cancelled after they had passed through about 20 to 30 people into the waiting area for boarding, I believe my flight was one of the very first to get canceled, the people in 8:30 a.m. flight being the very lucky ones who were the last to depart for LHR). I guess the news was just too incredible to me—I spent the next 10 minutes or so playing Hedgewars, before I got it through my thick head that I probably should talk to the airline people to see what I should do. I think these were the crucial minutes which cost about an hour or two in waiting time later at the Lufthansa Customer Service center one floor up.

After that hour or two of waiting (that I could have avoided, if I had the sense to take advantage of my good fortune in hearing about the plane cancellation so early), I talked to the Lufthansa people, and they were, for the most part, reasonable, if very slow: They put me on the 12:20 flight to LHR and gave me a voucher for a hotel stay and a meal up to 20 EUR. My personal objection, of course, was that they were making me stay in Frankfurt, my least favorite city in the world (it ranks behind St. Petersburg, a Russian city). Also, this would have been half a day of sight-seeing and trips in London missed, as well as my hostel reservation check in. So, I wanted to make an alternate arrangement to get me to London faster, and since this will involve modifications to the ticket and this is a United ticket, not Lufthansa, they told me to go talk to the United people.

And that’s where I made my second mistake. After eventually being directed to the United ticket counter, I tried to explain my intent carefully (the situation didn’t need explanations; whole airports were getting shut down): I could try to arrange for my own transportation to London (probably by train). I just wanted to make sure two things: (1) cancelling the FRA-LHR segment will not cancel the remainder of my trip ; (2) I’ll not get charged for the modification (given the situation), and in fact, that I should get reimbursed somehow for the segment not used (esp. since I will have to pay for the train ticket). Well. The customer service representative claimed that she absolutely could not modify the ticket. What she claimed was that cancelling this segment will get the remainder of the trip automatically cancelled by the computer system, and that she has no way to override that. This is where I made my second mistake: I believed her—as I found out the next day, when the newfound flexibility was useless, it was entirely possible to rework the whole ticket, not only to cancel just the FRA-LHR segment, but also to modify LHR-ORD-SFO segment, at no additional charge to me. I should have believed my own sense of reasonableness and pushed her harder, and perhaps demanded to talk to her supervisor. Escalate.

Anyways. That’s all the mistakes I made; the rest were, well, in God’s hands. I got to the hotel by their shuttle in the late afternoon. My ill-will towards Lufthansa softened a bit at finding that this was a 5-star hotel (and the room was definitely the best I’ve been in so far, including the stay at Doubletree in Oak Ridge, which was fancier than I was comfortable with in the first place). Here are some pictures of the room and the area:

The front view of the Kempinski Hotel Gravenbruch.


And some of the facilities that are available at the hotel … which is I guess fairly standard at most hotels bearing the name “resort”.


What was really nice was my room.


And the view from the room.

And the view of the room.

And the restaurant was pretty good—although much of that may have to do with the 20 EUR voucher; one would expect a great service at a place where you pay nearly 40 EUR for a dinner; it just felt good because I was paying less than half of what I’d pay.

So, although I might have held a grudge against Lufthansa over all the waits and rather useless customer service (about half the people I had to talk to over this whole fiasco weren’t helpful), as I do against Delta, I don’t.

Everything I did the day after was as good as it could have been done—but man plans, God accomplishes; I wasn’t to make this visit to London. I woke up at 5:45 a.m.; went down for breakfast at 6 a.m.; took the shuttle to airport at 6:45 a.m. (I guess I could’ve taken the 6:00 a.m. shuttle, so in hindsight, maybe that was the third mistake, but I’d have to weigh that against missing the complementary breakfast which was the best hotel breakfast I’ve had … that I didn’t have to pay for). The first thing I saw was a huge line at the Lufthansa counters. Imagine the polar opposite of this, 6 hours later:


Well. In any case, checking my ticket at one of the kiosks showed that my flight was cancelled anyway. So, not wanting to wait in such long lines (which, I guess, took about 3 to 5 hours to clear up, so if I had queued up, they’d probably have put me on another flight tomorrow 2 hours later or so, and maybe another night of free hotel stay, but without a perfect hindsight that everything I tried to do to get to London today would fail, that wasn’t a reasonable course of action), I headed over to the relatively short United ticket counter. And surprise, surprise, the customer service rep who was at the counter could modify my ticket. She cancelled the FRA-LHR segment, giving me a ticket for my record, and advising me to contact United after the trip to get them to reimburse me for my train ticket. Then, after filling out a form for the checked in luggage (BTW, I had wanted to carry this luggage on the plane; I only checked it in because of Lufthansa’s stupid rule about 8kg weight limit on carry-on and this has caused me more headaches than I’d care for) to be delivered to the London address where I hoped to be staying, I went to the travel center to book my train. The line was long (it was so long that it went around a staircase all the way around so that the end of the line was at the start of the line), but after 3 hours of waiting (i.e. about 11:30 p.m.), I got to the counter to book the ticket. After relatively curt exchange and long wait (this seems to be my typical German customer service experience (e.g. Lufthansa and whoever operates trains); rude and lacking in explanations, although United reps so far have been mostly nice—but they are Germans too, right? So what’s the difference?) the lady told me that there were absolutely no tickets to London until Monday. Because of that experience with United rep where I was told, to put it nicely, an untruth, I pushed her a little farther for clarification: Isn’t there anything with standing room only? What if I take a detour through another city? No. No.

And that’s when all my hopes vanished and I got to writing this post mortem. I have given up on the London trip this time around. I am glad enough to have booked for a direct flight to U.S., waitlisted for an early flight tomorrow (doubtful that I can make it) and confirmed reservation for a direct flight to SFO on Monday. If I can get out of this miserable city tomorrow morning, by God, I will. If not, as a friend suggested, I’ll take a train ride to escape this accursed city and the country (maybe Luxembourg, or even France) until I can return on Monday for the retreat to my beloved country.

Bangalore Half-day tour

March 29th, 2010

After some false starts and mishaps, I finally got an organized tour of Bangalore last Sunday. I hope to go on a Mysore tour next weekend. Here are some pictures from the tour.

One of the “false starts” was that the full-day tour I was originally booked for got cancelled because of some local election last Sunday. So, I booked myself on the afternoon half-day tour instead (that actually turned out to be better, because when I looked at the stops for the full-day tour, the half-day tour actually looked better; the full-day tour was filled with museums and planetariums, i.e. places that have little to do with Bangalore). So I had to kill some time from 7 a.m. to 1:30 p.m., and I stumbled upon this statue of Queen Victoria.

The first stop was this museum (and thankfully, the only museum in the list of stops):


Frankly, the outside of the museum looks better than anything else inside. Inside, you could find things like lathes and micrometers (huh, I didn’t know these common items at my lab in Berkeley were museum-worthy). There was one interesting exhibit though:

To figure out where the water is coming from, it’s important to note that here the water appears to drop straight down in a cylinder of constant diameter. But the physics of laminar flow of incompressible fluid under gravitational pull (in particular, the fluid velocity increases under gravitational pull, but the flow rate (area times fluid velocity) must stay constant) dictates the diameter must become narrower as water falls downward. I think they could’ve made this exhibit more tricky by fashioning the transparent pipe into the shape water would naturally have, and picking the right material with the index of refraction similar to water so that the underwater portion of the pipe won’t be so transparent. Then it is only through process of elimination that one can arrive at where the water must be coming from.

And we stopped by at Tippu’s summer palace,


which was fairly unimpressive, except perhaps this monument:

I really liked our next stop, Lalbagh Botanical Garden though.


It was a beautiful garden with beautiful paths

and lake.

As we had only one short hour there, not nearly enough time to look at everything I want to see in the garden,

not to mention map some unmapped sections of the footpaths, I plan on coming back later, perhaps next Saturday.

The tour ended at some Hindu temples, including the Bull Temple.


I felt a lot of ambivalence at these places, you know, first and second commandment and all that (especially at the Bull Temple, where I had a guide who encouraged me to touch the bull “for good luck” and where I also got a little red dot on my forehead, for whatever that meant). Well. I just remembered what Paul said about meat sacrificed to Greek idols: these Hindu idols also do not exist, and these gestures which could be interpreted as worship do not matter—if I do not mistake them for worship.

Author: bkpark Categories: travel Tags: , , , ,

Mexico travel advisory … and lack of media coverage?

March 17th, 2010

A friend of mine was complaining that the drug cartel violences just across the border weren’t getting enough media attention.

Well, here’s one less reason to be so worried:

From: Jonathan Poullard Dean of Student <adpa...@berkeley.edu>
Subject: Travel to Mexico Advisory
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 13:06:14 -0700

Dear UC Berkeley Students,

In response to the recent security concerns in Mexico, the U.S.
Department of State has issued a travel warning to U.S. travelers
traveling to and living in Mexico. Please read carefully the full
advisory notice at

http://travel.state.gov/travel/cis_pa_tw/tw/tw_mexico.html

Accordingly, UC Berkeley strongly advises against travel to Mexico
during Spring Break. We encourage students to discuss your travel plans
with family, friends, and other concerned parties as appropriate.

Should you have any further questions regarding your decision to travel,
please contact the Dean of Students Office at 642-6741.

Jonathan Poullard
Assistant Vice Chancellor/Dean of Students

Even if the liberal media is burying the story, afraid what the stories of violence in Mexico (and extending to U.S. citizens) would do to the sentiments towards immigrants and immigration, it looks like at least students at Berkeley will be well informed.

Of course, it’s another question whether the information would fall on deaf ears, but, well, let him who has ears to hear hear.

Update: In the interest of full disclosure, the update email:

From: "Harry Le Grande, Vice Chancellor - Student Affairs (campuswide)"
        <CALm...@berkeley.edu>
To: "Students, " <CALm...@berkeley.edu>
Subject: Travel Advisory to Mexico
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 10:44:57 -0700

Dear UC Berkeley Students,

On Tuesday, March 15, 2009 you received an email from me regarding travel to and
in Mexico during Spring Break. In recent days legitimate concerns have been
expressed that our initial message seemed to suggest that travel to any part of
the country would be ill-advised. This was not my intention. We are, in fact, in
complete agreement with a recent State Department Advisory that warns only
against travel to areas of Mexico that border the United States.

I would ask that you read the full advisory at:

http://travel.state.gov/travel/cis_pa_tw/tw/tw_mexico.html

I also encourage you to discuss your travel plans with family and friends. Your
safety and well-being is an important priority for us, and we just want to be
sure that you have a great Spring Break, no matter where you go.

Should you have any further questions regarding your vacation plans, feel free
to contact the Dean of Students Office at 642-6741.

Jonathan Poullard
Assistant Vice-Chancellor for Student Affairs
and Dean of Students
Campus Life and Leadership
326 Sproul Hall
UC Berkeley
Berkeley, CA 94720-2426
ph: (510) 642-6770
fax: (510) 642-7167
poul...@berkeley.edu

I can’t see how anyone could have misunderstood the first email to mean that the entire country of Mexico is unsafe. I mean, that’s like thinking the entire Indian subcontinent is unsafe just because Kashmir is not a place a tourist would want to go to. But, well, some people don’t know coffee at McDonald’s is hot, so.

Author: bkpark Categories: politics, ucb Tags: , , ,

Saturday’s Outing

March 8th, 2010

(If anyone asks why it took me 2 days to write this, I’m claiming that it’s taken me that long to recover from the trip.)

Last Saturday was my first weekend in Bangalore; no one else was coming to the lab (and I’m not … supposed to touch the equipments without a chaperon); so I decided to take a short tour around the city. There were some organized tours advertised on the Internet, but this being my first week (and my not being too familiar with the city’s public transportation system), I decided to venture out alone.

After a quick Google search, I had my primary objective: Vidhana Soudha. Well, long story short, I didn’t do much touring of the place (the gates looked so forbidding; I wasn’t sure if tourists were welcome in that place), and this picture was all I could take away:

But I did take a walk around the parks, both near the city center


and near the Raman Research Institute

which was nice. And I also sampled the local drinks, including one moosambi juice (bars weren’t open in the morning, unfortunately).

If I had to pick one striking difference in India so far (what some other people have been calling “culture shock”, although I wouldn’t call it that—let’s call it … a vague nostalgia, for me at least) is the different … character of road signs. I’ve been warned about lanes well before I came to India, but I wasn’t told about these:



Oh. And here’s one traffic rule I found out while walking around:

P.S. I got around this time on bus—both to the city center and back—despite the fact that I couldn’t find good information on the bus system online (or on the supposed route map at some bus stops). It turns out when you have a GPS (that instantly lets you know when the bus has taken a “wrong turn”), taking a random bus going in the approximately right direction works out fairly well. Also, it helped that I was willing to walk a fair distance (and the day pass was fairly cheap; only 32 rupees).

P.S. Oh, and haggling is very much … in fashion here. I was able to haggle a map of Bangalore down from 150 rupees to 100 rupees, and a hat from 100 rupees to 80 rupees by simply saying that original price was “too much”. Of course, the map was rather imprecise (and not as useful as my GPS) and the hat was cheaply made, but well, I bought them as souvenirs, not practical purpose (which was why any price was too much).

Author: bkpark Categories: travel Tags: , ,

Visit to Foreigners Registration Office

March 5th, 2010

I finally made the visit to FRO/FRRO (I’m not sure what FRRO would stand for) to register. I’ve done something similar in Russia so at least I’m familiar with the concept—for certain types of visas, they want to make sure that I entered the country in the manner I said I would, for the purpose that I said it was for. Despite numerous warnings about how painful this experience would be, it turned out to be a relatively smooth process, if lengthy, and I am happy about that. One thing that stood out is a sign that was hanging in the Foreigners’ Registration Office (I didn’t take a picture out of respect (and fear that I might get kicked out; at least in U.S. government offices are so … paranoid about cameras in the office), but I have the sign’s wording in verbatim):

ATTENTION

ALL THE VISITORS WHO ARE VISITING
FOREIGNERS REGISTRATION OFFICE, BANGALORE
CITY, FOR THEIR OFFICIAL WORK ARE HERE BY
INFORMED THAT IN CASE OF ANY DEMAND FOR
MONEY FOR OFFICIAL WORK OR UNNECESSARY
DELAY BY THE OFFICIALS MAY PLEASE CONTACT
ASST.COMMISSIONER OF POLICE (FOREIGNERS
SECTION) OR DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE
(F.R.O) BANGALORE CITY.

I guess they are trying to crack down on corruptions of the kind prevalent in developing countries, such as Mexico and South Korea (I have no direct experience with either, only anecdotes involving police officers and busy government offices).

I can’t say I’ve seen any … overt acts of corruption in my visit to FRO or elsewhere in India. There was some guy who was ushered in front of me at FRO with the, shall we say, bouncer recognizing him as “74″ (I had number 72 and there was another guy behind me who did really have 74), but aside from that, everything seemed relatively well-run, although busy and somewhat lacking in directions (it didn’t help that around the time my number came up, it was lunch time so many people were away at lunch).

So far, my short experience in India points to this place as being a region in transition: lanes are mostly ignored, but there are signs that admonish drivers to “Maintain lane discipline”. Roads are dusty in many places, but then, there are these trendy cafes that do serve expensive (compared to local food prices, for example) drinks. Perhaps in good time, India will come to be a place not too different from U.S. or Europe—I just wonder how the world economy would change with 1 billion more people in a well-developed market economy (for comparison, U.S. has only 300 million people).

Author: bkpark Categories: politics Tags: , , ,